KEY HIGHLIGHTS
- TVS Ntorq has a slightly more powerful engine.
- Suzuki Burgman Street offers better fuel economy.
- Ntorq has a longer wheelbase for stability.
- Burgman Street provides higher ground clearance.
- TVS Ntorq features advanced SmartXonnect technology.
Suzuki India was the pioneer in introducing the 125cc scooter in the country just when the 100cc scooter was emerging as a popular choice among buyers. Suzuki's 125cc masterpiece, the Burgman Street sets benchmarks in terms of performance, styling and features. Well, Suzuki started the 125cc scooter game in India, but taking note of the 125cc trend, other manufacturers also introduced their 125cc scooters in the country. Now, we have some established nameplates in this segment such as the Suzuki Burgman Street 125, TVS Ntorq 125, Yamaha Ray ZR Fi Hybrid and Suzuki Avenis as well. Earlier, we did a detailed comparison of the Yamaha Ray ZR 125 and the Suzuki Avenis and today we will be comparing the Burgman Street and TVS Ntorq to check how well these scooters stack against each other. Before moving ahead, join our 91Wheels WhatsApp Community to stay updated on the latest automotive news.
Read more: Upcoming Hero Destini 125 Scooter Teased Ahead Of Launch
Suzuki Burgman Street Vs TVS Ntorq 125: Engine
| Feature | Suzuki Burgman Street | TVS Ntorq |
|---|---|---|
| Engine Type | Air-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve | Air-cooled, 3-valve, SOHC |
| Displacement | 124 cc | 124.8 cc |
| Max Power | 8.7 PS @ 6750 rpm | 9.38 PS @ 7000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 10 Nm @ 5500 rpm | 10.5 Nm @ 5500 rpm |
| Fuel System | Fuel Injection | Fuel Injection |
| Transmission | CVT | CVT |
| Start Type | Electric & Kick | Electric Only |
| Mileage (claimed) | 53.5 kmpl | 47 kmpl |
However, both the TVS Ntorq and the Suzuki Burgman Street come powered by a 125cc engine, the Ntorq produces slightly higher power figures than the Burgman Street. Apart from this, both scooters get fuel-injection technology, the Ntorq's 3-valve engine feels more refined and powerful on the higher RPMs. With the lower power figures, the Burgman Street provides a better fuel economy than the Ntorq 125. I've ridden both of these scooters and after experiencing a ride on both, I would mention that the Ntorq has more balanced NVH levels which ultimately translate into a comfortable ride.
Dimensions and Storage
| Feature | Suzuki Burgman Street | TVS Ntorq |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 1884 mm | 1861 mm |
| Width | 713 mm | 710 mm |
| Height | 1140 mm | 1160 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1265 mm | 1285 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 160 mm | 155 mm |
| Kerb Weight | 108 kg | 116 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 5.6 Litres | 5.8 Litres |
| Under Seat Storage | 21.5 Litres | 22 Litres |
However, both scooters slightly differ in terms of dimensions, the Ntorq is taller and it has a longer wheelbase than the Burgman Street. Being bigger in length and height makes Ntorq a more stable scooter. Burgman Street has an edge over the Ntorq in terms of ground clearance, making it more suitable for uneven or broken patches of roads. The TVS Ntorq is 8 kg heavier than Burgman Street, so sudden manoeuvres would be much easier with Burgman Street. From the utility point of view, both Burgman and TVS Ntorq have a boot space of 21.5 litres and 22 litres respectively.
Suzuki Burgman Street Vs TVS Ntorq 125: Hardware
| Feature | Suzuki Burgman Street | TVS Ntorq |
|---|---|---|
| Frame Type | Underbone | Underbone |
| Front Suspension | Telescopic, Coil Spring, Oil Damped | Telescopic |
| Rear Suspension | Single shock | Hydraulic Type Coil Spring Shock Absorber |
| Front Tyre | 90/90-12 Tubeless | 100/80-12 Tubeless |
| Rear Tyre | 90/100-10 Tubeless | 100/80 on the EX Trim | 100/80-12 Tubeless |
| Front Brake | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brake | Drum | Drum |
Both the Burgman Street and the TVS Ntorq get the telescopic suspension in the front that provides a convenient ride, though not the best-in-class. Also, there are notable differences in the rear suspension as well. In my opinion, Burgman Street handles the suspension job well and it is way better than the Ntorq. On the braking front, both scooters feature a disc brake in the front and drum brakes at the rear.
Features
| Feature | Suzuki Burgman Street | TVS Ntorq |
|---|---|---|
| Instrument Cluster | Digital with Bluetooth Connectivity | Digital with Bluetooth Connectivity |
| Lighting | LED Headlight & Taillight | LED Headlight & Taillight |
| Connectivity | Suzuki Ride Connect | TVS SmartXonnect |
| Smart Features | Engine Auto Start-Stop, Side Stand Interlock | Navigation Assist, Last Parked Location Assist, Multi-Ride Stats, Incoming Call Alert/SMS Alert, etc. |
| Additional Features | Body Mounted Windscreen, Front Glove Box with DC Socket, Hazard Lamp, Combined Braking System | USB Charger, Engine Kill Switch, Pass Switch |
However, both scooters feature a digital instrument cluster, with Bluetooth connectivity but the TVS Ntorq unit offers more functionality and features, because of the SmartXonnect technology. The TVS's digital cluster offers functionalities such as navigation assist, ride stats and last parked location. The Burgman also supports Yamaha Ride Connect App which also offers features such as call/sms alerts and turn-by-turn navigation. Apart from this, Burgman Street has features such as a body-mounted windscreen, charging socket, hazard lamps and a pass switch.
Read more: Yamaha Aerox 155 Key Features Explained - Here's Everything It Gets
Verdict
Choosing between the Suzuki Burgman Street and TVS Ntorq depends on your preferences. The Burgman Street excels in comfort, fuel efficiency, and practicality with its generous storage and ground clearance. However, the TVS Ntorq offers more advanced technology and sportier performance with its refined engine and feature-rich digital cluster. If you prioritize comfort and utility, opt for the Burgman Street; for tech-savvy performance, choose the Ntorq.
